To the editor:
As I was participating in my Debate Team’s district qualifiers tournament MOCK congress session, a piece of legislation caught my eye that I completely agree with. It was a bill to encourage Smoking Bans within restaurants across the nation. If a state didn’t ban smoking throughout their entire state, this state would lose funding for Medicaid.
As I read this piece of legislation, even as someone pretending to be a representative, I began to think of more ways within my power of banning things within restaurants that were a nuisance to the public, seeing as I the authority would be able to look over the paternal needs within our public. Then suddenly ... it hit me. Fajitas! I could ban fajitas!
Fajitas are such a nuisance within the restaurant to the people around them. First of all, you can hear them coming from a mile away. The sizzle as the hot plate enters the room causes a huge disturbance! Everyone in the restaurant has now diverted their eyes to this Fajita Fallacy and looks in disgust. Second the smell! The onions reek to the high heavens and make my eyes water! Third, THE SMOKE! The smoke from the fajita plate has filled the entire room! Here I am trying to enjoy a nice meal with my family ... and you are bringing in all that smoke! I leave the restaurant and all I smell like is smoke! SMOKE, SMOKE, SMOKE! I mean can these fajita eaters just eat fajitas from the inside of their homes! Or perhaps step outside and eat their fajitas from the outside of the restaurant? Or maybe even get a to-go box!
In conclusion, I feel that as a MOCK legislator after passing that bill that we should begin to look at other ways we can use our power to make restaurants safer and more enjoyable to the consumer. After all the real legislators always make the right decisions to look out for the best interest of the people even if it means stepping on some rights in the process. The point is that power should always be used as means of paternal, philanthropic means to protect the people.
— Corbin McDavitt
Laurel
Letters to the Editor
Banning smokey fajitas in restaurants
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Letter to the editor: Poor Planning
Just one year ago a killing tornado flattened a great portion of Tuscaloosa, Ala. Many families in this stricken area still don’t have a place to live or call home.
- Whose side is he on?
- Reader disagrees with assessment of Tebow
-
Donations requested for local kidney patient
To the Editor:
Mrs. Herticine Parkman is a kidney patient who has been battling with kidney failure for quite some time. Most of us have been blessed with the wealth of our health. With that being said we are asking for donations to help Mrs. Parkman with this process which has been very costly. -
Letter to the editor: Sheriff Hodge opposes early release of murderer
Please note my complete and total opposition to the early release of convicted murderer James Pugh who has an upcoming parole hearing before your Board.
-
DAFS says thanks for your support
To the editor:
On behalf of the clients, staff and board of the Domestic Abuse Family Shelter, Inc., I want to thank all of you who have supported us throughout this past year. - Which side is Palazzo on?
-
Constituent not happy with Palazzo
To the editor:
A year ago we replaced Congressman Gene Taylor because he had thrown in with the liberal Democrats and Speaker Pelosi and was voting with them most of the time. We elected Steven Palazzo to replace him because he was the only one running against Taylor and we were hoping he would do a better job. -
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus
Eight-year-old Virginia O’Hanlon wrote a letter to the editor of New York’s Sun, and the quick response was printed as an unsigned editorial Sept. 21, 1897. The work of veteran newsman Francis Pharcellus Church has since become history’s most reprinted newspaper editorial, appearing in part or whole in dozens of languages in books, movies, and other editorials, and on posters and stamps.
-
Athletics ‘dumbing down’ civilization
To the editor:
We can but muse about the reported $254 million dollar contract recently awarded a professional baseball player! Contracts in excess of $100 million have seemingly become routine in all of professional athletics: football, basketball, golf and who knows what else these days. We are told “these amounts (being paid to what can best be labeled ‘a discretionary workforce within our society’) are actually well within what the market will bear” — just mostly from dollars generated by television networks out of advertising accounts. - More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Letter to the editor: Poor Planning






